Higham Lab

University of California, Riverside

Non-uniform evolutionary response of gecko eye size to changes in diel activity patterns


Journal article


L. Schmitz, T. Higham
Biology Letters, 2018

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMedCentral PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Schmitz, L., & Higham, T. (2018). Non-uniform evolutionary response of gecko eye size to changes in diel activity patterns. Biology Letters.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Schmitz, L., and T. Higham. “Non-Uniform Evolutionary Response of Gecko Eye Size to Changes in Diel Activity Patterns.” Biology Letters (2018).


MLA   Click to copy
Schmitz, L., and T. Higham. “Non-Uniform Evolutionary Response of Gecko Eye Size to Changes in Diel Activity Patterns.” Biology Letters, 2018.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{l2018a,
  title = {Non-uniform evolutionary response of gecko eye size to changes in diel activity patterns},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Biology Letters},
  author = {Schmitz, L. and Higham, T.}
}

Abstract

Geckos feature a large range of eye sizes, but what drives this phenotypic diversity is currently unknown. Earlier studies point towards diel activity patterns (DAPs) and locomotory mode, but phylogenetic comparative studies in support of the proposed adaptive mode of eye evolution are lacking. Here, we test the hypothesis of DAPs as the driver of eye size evolution with a dataset on 99 species of gecko. Results from phylogenetic generalized least-square analysis (PGLS) and multivariate model-fitting reveal smaller eyes in diurnal geckos consistent with different phenotypic optima. However, Bayesian analyses of selective regime shifts demonstrate that only two of nine transitions from nocturnal to diurnal activity are coupled with decreases in eye size, and two other regime shifts are not associated with DAP transitions. This non-uniform evolutionary response suggests that eye size is not the only functionally relevant variable. Evolutionary adaptations may therefore include different combinations of several traits (e.g. photoreceptors), all with the same functional outcome. Our results further demonstrate that DAP only partially explains eye size diversity in geckos. As open habitats favour the evolution of large eyes while obstructed habitats favour small eyes, the degree of habitat clutter emerges as another potential axis of eye diversification.