Higham Lab

University of California, Riverside

Kinematic integration during prey capture varies among individuals but not ecological contexts in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus (Perciformes: Centrarchidae)


Journal article


E. Kane, T. Higham
2020

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Kane, E., & Higham, T. (2020). Kinematic integration during prey capture varies among individuals but not ecological contexts in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus (Perciformes: Centrarchidae).


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Kane, E., and T. Higham. “Kinematic Integration during Prey Capture Varies among Individuals but Not Ecological Contexts in Bluegill Sunfish, Lepomis Macrochirus (Perciformes: Centrarchidae)” (2020).


MLA   Click to copy
Kane, E., and T. Higham. Kinematic Integration during Prey Capture Varies among Individuals but Not Ecological Contexts in Bluegill Sunfish, Lepomis Macrochirus (Perciformes: Centrarchidae). 2020.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{e2020a,
  title = {Kinematic integration during prey capture varies among individuals but not ecological contexts in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus (Perciformes: Centrarchidae)},
  year = {2020},
  author = {Kane, E. and Higham, T.}
}

Abstract

The general ability of components of an organism to work together to achieve a common goal has been termed integration and is often studied empirically by deconstructing organisms into component parts and quantifying covariation between them. Kinematic traits describing movement are useful for allowing organisms to respond to ecological contexts that vary over short time spans (milliseconds, minutes, etc.). Integration of these traits can contribute to the maintenance of the function of the whole organism, but it is unclear how modulation of component kinematic traits affects their integration. We examined the integration of swimming and feeding during capture of alternative prey types in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Despite the expected modulation of kinematics, integration within individuals was inflexible across prey types, suggesting functional redundancy for solving a broad constraint. However, integration was variable among individuals, suggesting that individuals vary in their solutions for achieving whole-organism function and that this solution acts as a ‘top-down’ regulator of component traits, which provides insight into why kinematic variation is observed. Additionally, variation in kinematic integration among individuals could serve as an understudied target of environmental selection on prey capture, which is a necessary first step towards the observed divergence in integration among populations and species.